Jun 8, 2007

Har Har, Jujhar.


Happened to watch Headlines Today the past two days. Was forced to run away from the drawing room leaving behind a half eaten dinner* for the first time in my life.

Day 1:

The Host: Jujhar Singh

The topic of discussion: Women’s rights groups up in arms against profane ads.

The cause of Nausea:

The ‘ad-nauseum’ in question was one advertisement for Amul Macho showing a couple of ladies grow green when the village belle seemingly sees bliss in washing her man’s underwear. The arbitrator Mr. Jujhar Singh pitted Mr.R.Balakrishnan (of Cheeni Kum fame) against a women’s rights activist. I am perennially skeptical about anyone with feminist leanings, and had been reasonably impressed by Mr.Balki from the reviews of his movie, and was naturally quite interested in how the argument was going to fare.

Mr.Balki defended his fraternity with a fairly lame argument saying the ad was infact liberationist by showing a female boldly expressing her sexuality. He also did not fail to commend the “creative” juices that poured into the “masterpiece”.
There are so many brilliant ads that so many of us have grown up with, and cherish even though the products they advertised have long become obsolete, and they did not resort to such blatant profanity to be creative. But our dear Mr. Arbitrator lapped up this argument, with a fervent “Aye Aye, Sir”.

This rights activist was slightly different from her ilk, in the sense, that she didn’t raise her voice, although she didn’t really approve of her opponent’s views. She quietly discounted all the aspects, that she had initially put forth, (like women’s dignity, sensibility, blah blah, and the like) but hung on to one particular PoV, that of the aesthetics that this kind of explicit lewdness would instill in young Indians. Mr. Balki had no solid answer to this.
That’s when our heroic arbitrator jumped in and drawled with a resonant belch (that was meant to pass off as a stylish nasal accent), “But, ma’m, don’t you think we are over-reacting and stifling the creativity of our talented young ad-makers?”

Tolerance Meter hit red, and I ran out, secretly wishing I had a stronger hold on my senses.

Day 2:

The host: Jujhar Singh again.

Heated Debate on: Yuvraj vs. Yuvraj.

The cause of Vertigo, Nausea, and partial deafness:

Yuvraj Singh’s birthday bash case. Neelam Mahajan poised to create a new record in pushing the decibels, the wronged mother fuming in the studio, and Mrs.Singh, on the phone. Our dear arbitrator went tipsy with glee. For the lady beside him was set for some action.
The matter being sub-judice was of course something that HT and our dear Jujhar had so graciously chosen to overlook. Mrs.Singh not being able to hold up to Mrs.Mahajan’s well-toned vocal chords looked like a lamb ready for sacrifice.
Had it not been Jujhar and HT’s shrewd move to keep the two ladies physically separated from each other, the damage to life and property would have been immense. A heated exchange of words ensued. Some even warranting a defamatory suit, that might have had Mrs. Singh in the studio, and Mrs. Mahajan on phone, maybe, for want of a refreshing change.
Jujhar gave a toothy smile, and blurted out something inane in his guttural twang. In case, you had been counting the morsels on your plate for want of a suitable diversion, and had to lift your head fearing a crick in the neck, the progress of the fight flashed on the screen, each scandalous utterance making way to a new line of trash, uhmm… flash.

Tolerance Meter went bonkers. I stumbled out of the room, fighting for dear life and desperately clinging on to what was once my sanity.


*: Was forced to flee, as for reasons best known to him, my father insisted on keeping HT on at full volume. Jujhar kept chasing me to the remotest corner of the house, with his debonair din.

13 comments:

Nero said...

nothing works better for a brand than a full blown controversy :)

Sirpy said...

Lol... Amazing similies.. Easy to comment and criticise... Come to think of it, the Axe ads are singularly funny...

Aravindh Krishnamoorthy said...

The 1/2 hour news on good ol'DD conveyed more NEWS than the 24 hour news channels. The simple reason (that we all understand) being commercialisation to the core of these (so-called) modern news channels. What else would explain ramp-model-turned-news-readers and ranters-turned-news readers ?
Modern news channels tend to sensationalise news items for their benifit and in the process disregard the viewers. A word about the viewers: A very few serious viewers look for news on mondern news channels, most of them are looking for no-commitment 1/2 hour stories or ramp-models (or well dressed sensations.)
The golden rule: ABSTAIN.
Here's something I'd cooked up some time back 'bout the news channels:
HEADLINES TODAY: Shout, shout so much that the viewers think everything you say is important.
NDTV: Sensationalise news. Make it appealing to the viewers.
STAR NEWS: Cover all the peripheral aspects of the story, guys will be bugged out of the core issues eventually.
TIMES NOW: Add babes on board, the guys will like it irrespective of whether our news items make sense or not. They're ignorant ? No problems, only looks matter.
CNN IBN: Provide seemingly intellectual view of the news item. (Guys, intellectual analysis of crap results in crap.)

- Aravindh

~SuCh~ said...

@nero : A controversy can draw attention to a brand, but it takes more than that to build its value.
And sometimes, it works against the brand too.
@sirpy: ads can be suggestive, naughty, and sly.. But there is a thin line between all that and ribaldry. And however squint-eyed one might be, one can't afford to overlook it.

@arvind:
The saddest part is, that even a good journalist is forced to put up a show for higher ratings. Used to admire Pranoy roy, Barkha, Karan Thapar, and Rajdeep Sardesai once upon a time. Its always money vs morals. The eternal battle.

Aravindh Krishnamoorthy said...

Yeah, tend to agree on that one - 'Money vs Morals' (but off context.) Eternal ? Naah.

Karthik said...

Firstly that AMUL (pity that it shares it's name with a brand renowned for Ad's) ad is sick - the first time i was like awestruck by the stupidity of the ad. Well lets face it - the ad was intended to raise eyebrows and the best way to defeat it's purpose would be not to discuss it !!

Ohh - and as a rule i dont watch news shows hosted by male anchors !! C'mon when we know half of what they say is crap, i can atleast ogle at the lovely anchors !!

~SuCh~ said...

@ arvind: yes. its eternal as long as man continues live in a society, he always vacillates between living for himself or for the people around him. Money and Morals can be on both sides. (shifting off- context further more).

@karthik:
know your views on the lovely anchors "pretty" well... :)
As for the ad, I didnt raise my eye-brow, till Jujhar did it !! :)

Anonymous said...

Buy geriforte ED liv52 Sale rebetol Without prescription lamictal Canadian glucotrol Side-effects zofran

Anonymous said...

The author of silenceofthesea.blogspot.com has written an excellent article. You have made your point and there is not much to argue about. It is like the following universal truth that you can not argue with: There?s no such thing as a "dirty" word; words only mean what the listener thinks they mean. Thanks for the info.

Anonymous said...

silenceofthesea.blogspot.com is the best. Thank your for this article. I enjoyed it very much.
AAA Toronto Payday Loans 1172 Bay St #101, Toronto, ON M5S 2B4 (416) 477-2817

Anonymous said...

comment5, nudity of celebrity, 8-[[, ninel conde hot, >:(, sara jean underwood nude, 57379, jenn sterger naked, aop,

Anonymous said...

clomid metformin | clomid 100mg - price of clomid without insurance, side effects of clomid 50mg

Anonymous said...

iui success rates with clomid and ovidrel | buy clomid 100mg uk - 200 mg clomid, clomid reviews